‘I Stand By My Opinion’: Hansal Mehta On His Criticism To The Accidental Prime Minister Amid Row

by

Veteran actor Anupam Kher has sharply criticised filmmaker Hansal Mehta for his recent comments on The Accidental Prime Minister, a political drama based on the tenure of Dr. Manmohan Singh as India’s Prime Minister (2004–2014). Mehta, who served as the film’s creative director and portrayed former Odisha Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik in a cameo, publicly apologised last week, following Dr. Singh’s death, for being part of a project he felt tarnished the late leader’s legacy.

Kher, a lead actor in the film, responded strongly, accusing Mehta of hypocrisy for denouncing a film he helped create. “It is unethical to criticise a project you were deeply involved in,” Kher asserted.

 

Addressing Kher’s remarks, Mehta expressed disappointment over the personal attacks. “Mr. Kher is a senior, and I hold him in high regard. His film Saaransh inspired me to become a filmmaker. But I find it uncalled for when he resorts to name-calling and unfounded insinuations,” Mehta said. “Yes, I was on set for 35 days. Does that imply I was on a picnic? I fulfilled my professional commitments sincerely, despite significant creative disagreements.”

Mehta elaborated on his dissatisfaction with the film, citing issues with its tone, pacing, and execution. “Films are a director’s medium. Vijay Gutte, a first-time director, had a clear vision and rarely sought my input beyond casting and logistical assistance. While I was compensated during a challenging phase in my life, my involvement was limited. The final product diverged significantly from what I had envisioned,” he added.

Reflecting on his decision to work on the film, Mehta revealed the personal struggles he faced at the time, including financial debt, litigation, and health issues. “I joined the project out of gratitude to the producer, who had supported my earlier film Shahid. It was a decision born out of necessity, not passion,” he explained.

Responding to the backlash following Dr. Singh’s death, Mehta said, “It is disheartening to see vitriol during such a solemn time. Dr. Singh’s passing compelled me to reflect on my error in judgment in associating with the film. My intention was never to deflect criticism but to acknowledge my regret.”

While acknowledging their differences, Mehta extended respect to Kher. “We are both opinionated individuals. My criticism of the film stands, as does my commitment to the work I was hired to do. I only wish the discourse could remain professional and constructive,” he concluded.

 

Tags:

You may also like...