Site icon Woman's era Magazine

Kapil Sharma’s Faces Rs 25 Crore Lawsuit Over ‘Baburao’ Impersonation

Producer Firoz A Nadiadwala has issued a legal notice demanding ₹25 crore from Netflix and the creators of The Great Indian Kapil Show. The lawsuit alleges that the popular comedy show used Paresh Rawal’s iconic “Baburao Ganpatrao Apte” character from the beloved Hera Pheri franchise without obtaining proper permission. This legal action comes just as The Great Indian Kapil Show is set to air its final episode, featuring superstar Akshay Kumar as a guest. The controversy initially erupted when comedian Kiku Sharda impersonated the character, a role made eternally famous by Paresh Rawal. Nadiadwala, who unequivocally holds the rights to the character, claims that this portrayal was carried out without his essential consent, sparking a major debate about copyright and character ownership in the entertainment industry.

​Nadiadwala emphatically stated that nobody has the right to exploit the character of Baburao for wrongful commercial gain. As reported by News 18, he asserted, “Baburao is not just a character, but the soul of Hera Pheri. This legacy was built with our sweat, vision, and creativity, and no one can hijack or misuse it without our permission.” His statement underscores the deep emotional and creative investment he and his team have in the Hera Pheri franchise and its iconic characters. The producer also highlighted Paresh Rawal‘s dedication to the role, emphasizing the actor’s profound contribution. “Paresh Rawalji nurtured the role and put his heart and soul into it. No one has the right to misuse it for wrongful commercial gain. We will protect what we have created because culture is not for exploitation, it is for preservation,” he added, making a strong case for the protection of creative intellectual property.

​Legal Ramifications and Demands for Resolution

​The legal notice meticulously outlines several alleged violations, pinpointing specific sections of Indian law. These include copyright infringement under Section 51 of the Copyright Act, 1957, which deals with unauthorized use of copyrighted works, and trademark infringement under Section 29 of the Trademarks Act, protecting registered brand identities. The complaint further cites infringement of exclusive rights under Section 14 of the Copyright Act, which comprehensively covers communication of a work to the public and its inclusion in films. According to Nadiadwala’s legal team, led by Sana Raees Khan, the character of Baburao is not merely an iconic role but also a registered trademark explicitly owned by his family. This detail significantly strengthens their legal position, as trademark registration provides robust protection against unauthorized use for commercial purposes.

Demand is Straight: ‘Remove Baburao’s Bit from the Show’

​In the legal notice, Nadiadwala’s team has laid down clear and stringent demands. They have called for the immediate removal of the segment featuring the Baburao impersonation from Netflix and all associated third-party channels and social media platforms where it might have been distributed. Furthermore, the notice seeks a written assurance from Netflix and the show’s creators that the character will not be used again in the future without explicit authorization from Nadiadwala. They have also demanded a public apology within 24 hours, emphasizing the seriousness of the alleged infringement and the need for prompt rectification.

​Sana Raees Khan, the lawyer representing Firoz A Nadiadwala, underscored the gravity of the matter, issuing a stern warning to those who might consider creative works as free-for-all. She stated, “The unauthorized use of my client’s iconic character is not just infringement; it is blatant theft for commercial gain.” Her remarks highlight the legal team’s strong stance against what they perceive as a clear violation of intellectual property rights. Khan further elaborated on the legal principles at play, adding, “The law will not allow the dilution of rights that have been lawfully earned and zealously protected. These rights will be defended with the full force of legal action so that no one treats a creative legacy as a free commodity for exploitation.” This assertive legal position indicates that Nadiadwala is prepared to pursue all available legal avenues to protect his creative assets and set a precedent against similar infringements in the future.

About Kapil Sharma Comedy Show

​The Great Indian Kapil Show, which has been streaming on Netflix, airs its episodes on Saturdays at 8 pm. The lawsuit introduces a significant legal challenge for the show just as its first season concludes, potentially impacting future collaborations and setting a precedent for character rights in the burgeoning digital entertainment space.

Exit mobile version